Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is there no MSVC support?
#6
Initially we focused on porting to Linux, so support for GCC and Clang was first priority. Then, adding Windows support was easier using MinGW and MXE, as GCC was already supported. The problem with MSVC was until recently poor support for C++11, especially two features we use: range-based for loops and initializer lists. With latest updates to MSVC 2013, it seems all we need is supported, so we can finally add it as supported. The remaining problem is getting it to compile with all necessary libraries. I could give it a try sometime later and see if it really works.

PS. Yeah, I'm back Smile


Messages In This Thread
Why is there no MSVC support? - by Simbax - 04-19-2015, 05:03 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by krzys_h - 04-19-2015, 05:37 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by Simbax - 04-19-2015, 05:55 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by tomangelo - 04-19-2015, 06:00 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by krzys_h - 04-19-2015, 06:16 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by piotrdz - 04-25-2015, 02:52 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by tomangelo - 04-25-2015, 05:07 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by Simbax - 04-25-2015, 09:04 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by piotrdz - 04-26-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by tomangelo - 04-26-2015, 11:22 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by piotrdz - 04-27-2015, 07:11 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by Simbax - 05-05-2015, 02:28 PM
RE: Why is there no MSVC support? - by piotrdz - 05-05-2015, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)